[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1277380649.1875.962.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:57:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 13:55 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > but we don't have anything else that does that.
>
> Actually we do, audit in syscalls and scheduling in interrupts and signals
> all work this way. Probably more at some point adding more code to this
> path was very popular.
That's the return to user path, nothing to do with softirqs. Add a TIF
flag and call your function there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists