[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100624120226.GH578@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:02:26 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 13:55 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > but we don't have anything else that does that.
> >
> > Actually we do, audit in syscalls and scheduling in interrupts and signals
> > all work this way. Probably more at some point adding more code to this
> > path was very popular.
>
> That's the return to user path, nothing to do with softirqs. Add a TIF
> flag and call your function there.
It does that, but there are some cases where it's not enough.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists