[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100624133323.GN578@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:33:23 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mauro@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
> If its a critical error you do all the handling in the kernel and you
I assume you mean in MCE. And the answer is no.
MCE generally can only panic or log, everything else
needs other contexts.
> don't need task context at all, no?
Process context is needed for various recovery schemes, all
that need to sleep for example.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists