[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100624150335.GA10501@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:03:35 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: Tom Lyon <pugs@...n-about.com>, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, hjk@...utronix.de, avi@...hat.com,
gregkh@...e.de, aafabbri@...co.com, scofeldm@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] VFIO driver: Non-privileged user level PCI drivers
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:22:19PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 02:14:00PM -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 June 2010 03:23:39 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > OK, after more investigation, I realize you are right.
> > We definitely need the IOMMU protection for interrupts, and
> > if we have it, a lot of the code for config space protection is pointless.
> > It does seem that the Intel intr_remapping code does what we want
> > (accidentally) but that the AMD iommu code does not yet do any
> > interrupt remapping. Joerg - can you comment? On the roadmap?
>
> Work on this is planned, but not at a high priority by now. I can
> re-prioritize this item if needed.
>
> Joerg
As a stop-gap measure, we could get by with a
portable API that let us figure out whether a given iommu supports
interrupt remapping.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists