linux-kernel - Re: while_each_thread() under rcu_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100625095548.GA6292@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:55:48 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: while_each_thread() under rcu_read_lock() is broken?

On 06/24, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:57:02PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 06/24, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > 4.	Some other thread might do pthread_exit(), removing itself
> > > 	from the thread group, and again might do so while the hapless
> > > 	reader is referencing that thread.  In this case, we want
> > > 	the hapless reader to continue scanning the remainder of the
> > > 	thread group.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > But, if that thread was used as a starting point g, then
> >
> > 	before the patch:	loop forever
> > 	after the patch:	break
>
> So it is OK to skip some of the other threads in this case, even
> though they were present throughout the whole procedure?

I think, yes. We can miss them in any case, they can go away before
while_each_thread(g, t) starts the scan.

If g == group_leader (old or new), then we should notice this thread
at least.

Otherwise we can miss them all, with or without next_thread_careful().

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/