linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 06/10] cifs: define inode-level cache object and register them

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22697.1277470549@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:55:49 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
	linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 06/10] cifs: define inode-level cache object and register them

Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de> wrote:

> I think the creation time is currently being ignored as we won't be able
> to accomodate in POSIX stat struct.

The FS-Cache interface doesn't use the POSIX stat struct, but it could be
really useful to save it and use it for cache coherency inside the kernel.

Out of interest, what does Samba do when it comes to generating a creation time
for UNIX where one does not exist?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/