linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] cpumask: make task_struct.cpus_allowed a cpumask_var

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006251058180.18900@router.home>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:00:25 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, anton@...ba.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, anton@...ba.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] cpumask: make task_struct.cpus_allowed a
 cpumask_var_t

On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Rusty Russell wrote:

> Even better would be to point to the fixed "one cpu" and "all cpus"
> masks where possible, and make a copy when setting it to something
> else.  But you'd have to track down those naughty places which frob it
> directly...

Put it into a read only segment?

What is the estimated performance impact of adding a level of indirection
(and a potential cache miss) to a number of critical code paths?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/