[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikicz4WXG2GRuoc9RUZy9AmpYuoi5ifEXO6g2EJ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:40:22 -0700
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] new stat*fs-like syscall?
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:45, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> I don't quite get what ST_WRITE is supposed to mean. All but that one
> can be supported trivially.
ST_WRITE comes elsewhere. We don't use it on Linux.
> In addition ST_APPEND and ST_IMMUTABLE are rather puzzling. Do you
> really want these to mean if the file we call statfs on have the
> immutable/append only bits set? That is mixing two bits of stat
> information into statfs?
Ignore these as well, they also has a different source.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists