lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:40:22 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] new stat*fs-like syscall?

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:45, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> I don't quite get what ST_WRITE is supposed to mean.  All but that one
> can be supported trivially.

ST_WRITE comes elsewhere.  We don't use it on Linux.


> In addition ST_APPEND and ST_IMMUTABLE are rather puzzling.  Do you
> really want these to mean if the file we call statfs on have the
> immutable/append only bits set?  That is mixing two bits of stat
> information into statfs?

Ignore these as well, they also has a different source.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ