[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18628.1277502398@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:46:38 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...ba.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 06/10] cifs: define inode-level cache object and register them
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...ba.org> wrote:
> Looks like it mostly uses the ctime. IMO, the mtime would be a better
> choice since it changes less frequently, but I don't guess that it
> matters very much.
I'd've thought mtime changes more frequently since that's altered when data is
written. ctime is changed when attributes are changed.
Note that Ext4 appears to have a file creation time field in its inode
(struct ext4_inode::i_crtime[_extra]). Can Samba be made to use that?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists