[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100625222953.GE13421@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 00:29:53 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, davem <davem@...emloft.net>,
paulus <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work -v2
> perf has two different reasons to for the callback, what I do is set the
> state and enqueue, if its already enqueued the pending callback will
> handle both.
>
> Its cheaper than having two callback structures per event.
Again it sounds like you just need a bit...
>
> We can expose the claim/enqueue thing separately so that users can
> choose.
Yes it would be good to separate that, because I doubt other users
will require similar hacks.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists