[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikEpj6EkJJ2dWs12JiODF8pl4foYq_AZtzxP2ef@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:23:33 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
2010/6/25 Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>:
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 15:48 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 10:12 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>> >
>> > It is better to add "void *data" field in this struct to allow same
>> > function can be used for multiple struct irq_work.
>>
>> No, simply do:
>>
>> struct my_foo {
>> struct irq_work work;
>> /* my extra data */
>> }
>>
>> void my_func(struct irq_work *work)
>> {
>> struct my_foo *foo = container_of(work, struct my_foo, work);
>>
>> /* tada! */
>> }
>
> Yes. This works too. But Adding "void *data" field is helpful if you do
> not embed struct irq_work into another struct.
That's what makes most sense. If you use work->data to put foo, then
you can also do the opposite. Now the best is to pick the choice that
gives you a real type and a typechecking, and not an error-prone and
obfuscated void *
This is the way things are made in the kernel. struct work_struct, struct list,
struct rcu_head, etc... are all embedded into a container, so that we can
use container_of.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists