[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1277541405.1875.993.camel@laptop>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:36:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, davem <davem@...emloft.net>,
paulus <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work -v2
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 00:29 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Yes it would be good to separate that, because I doubt other users
> will require similar hacks.
You're such a constructive critic..
I would think every NMI user would need them since NMI can interrupt at
any time, and if you have a limited number of irq_work structs (like 1
per cpu) you'll end up with wanting to enqueue an already enqueued one
at some point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists