lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100626101613.GA27972@lst.de>
Date:	Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:16:13 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: trying to understand READ_META, READ_SYNC, WRITE_SYNC & co

On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 08:10:45PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> But I'm sure apps can submit fsyncs much faster than once per
> few ms, like small database transactions.

fsync / O_SYNC should be irrelevant for the idling logic.  One those
retourn to the user data must have made it to the disk, and with our
barrier implementation that implies fully draining any outstanding I/O
on the device.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ