[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100626101613.GA27972@lst.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:16:13 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: trying to understand READ_META, READ_SYNC, WRITE_SYNC & co
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 08:10:45PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> But I'm sure apps can submit fsyncs much faster than once per
> few ms, like small database transactions.
fsync / O_SYNC should be irrelevant for the idling logic. One those
retourn to the user data must have made it to the disk, and with our
barrier implementation that implies fully draining any outstanding I/O
on the device.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists