Message-ID: <4C272C1C.9000802@orcon.net.nz>
Date:	Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:46:52 +1200
From:	Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC:	airlied@...il.com, mattst88@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
	rth@...ddle.net, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru,
	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, alexdeucher@...il.com,
	jglisse@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Problems with alpha/pci + radeon/ttm

On 27/06/10 16:20, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:51:40 +1200
> Michael Cree<mcree@...on.net.nz>  wrote:
>
>>>> Is this a regression (what kernel version worked)?
>>>>
>>>> Seems that the IOMMU can't find 128 pages. It's likely due to:
>>>>
>>>> - out of the IOMMU space (possibly someone doesn't free the IOMMU
>>>>    space).
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>> - the mapping parameters (such as align) aren't appropriate so the
>>>>    IOMMU can't find space.
>>>
>>> I don't think KMS drivers have ever worked on alpha so its not a
>>> regression, they are working fine on x86 + powerpc and sparc has been
>>> run at least once.
>>
>> KMS on the console boot up has worked since about 2.6.32, but starting
>> up the X server has always failed and, in my case, the system becomes
>> unstable and eventually OOPs.
>>
>>> I suspect we are simply hitting the limits of the iommu, how big an
>>> address space does it handle? since generally graphics drivers try to
>>> bind a lot of things to the GART.
>>
>> No idea on the address space limit.  I applied the patch of Fujita that
>> logs all IOMMU allocations, and also inserted some extra printks in the
>> ttm kernel code so that I could see which routines failed and the error
>> code returned.  Running the radeon test on boot exhibits the following:
>>
>> [  238.712768] [drm] Tested GTT->VRAM and VRAM->GTT copy for GTT offset
>> 0x1a312000
>> [  239.281127] [drm] Tested GTT->VRAM and VRAM->GTT copy for GTT offset
>> 0x1a412000
>> [  239.281127] ttm_tt_bind belched -12
>> [  239.282104] ttm_bo_handle_move_mem belched -12
>> [  239.282104] ttm_bo_move_buffer belched -12
>> [  239.282104] ttm_bo_validate belched -12
>> [  239.282104] radeon 0000:01:00.0: object_init failed for (1048576,
>> 0x00000002) err=-12
>> [  239.282104] [drm:radeon_test_moves] *ERROR* Failed to create GTT
>> object 419
>> [  239.399291] Error while testing BO move.
>>
>> Note that no IOMMU allocations are printed while radeon_test_moves is
>> running so iommu_arena_alloc doesn't appear to be called.  Also the
>> error code returned up to radeon_test_moves is -12 which is ENOMEM.  So
>> does appear to be some memory limit.
>
> Hmm, not related with IOMMU? looks like ttm_tt_populate could return
> ENOMEM too. Can we locate where we hit ENOMEM first?

Yeah, in ttm_mem_global_reserve while it is walking glob->zones:

[  239.303588] [drm] Tested GTT->VRAM and VRAM->GTT copy for GTT offset 
0x1a412000
[  239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve zone used_mem (0x1a5f0000) exceeds 
limit (0x1a5ef000)
[  239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve zone used_mem (0x1a5f0000) exceeds 
limit (0x1a5ef000)
[  239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve zone used_mem (0x1a5f0000) exceeds 
limit (0x1a5ef000)
[  239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve zone used_mem (0x1a5f0000) exceeds 
limit (0x1a5ef000)
[  239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve zone used_mem (0x1a5f0000) exceeds 
limit (0x1a5ef000)
[  239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve return non-zero count decs to zero
[  239.304564] ttm_mem_global_alloc_page belched -12
[  239.304564] __ttm_tt_get_page coughed NULL
[  239.304564] ttm_tt_populate belched -12
[  239.304564] ttm_tt_bind belched -12
[  239.304564] ttm_bo_handle_move_mem belched -12
[  239.304564] ttm_bo_move_buffer belched -12
[  239.304564] ttm_bo_validate belched -12

On a hunch that we are chasing a red herring I installed another 256MB 
of memory into the machine (was 576MB for the test reported above) for a 
total of 832MB.

Now radeon_test_moves runs to completion without error.

OK, now a test of starting up the X server - ah, a bus error again but 
now it looks like it's in the radeon driver:

[  1435.014] (II) EXA(0): Driver allocated offscreen pixmaps
[  1435.014] (II) EXA(0): Driver registered support for the following 
operations:
[  1435.014] (II)         Solid
[  1435.014] (II)         Copy
[  1435.014] (II)         Composite (RENDER acceleration)
[  1435.014] (II)         UploadToScreen
[  1435.014] (II)         DownloadFromScreen
[  1435.030]
Backtrace:
[  1435.032] 0: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x54) [0x120070884]
[  1435.032] 1: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (0x120000000+0x65608) [0x120065608]
[  1435.033] 2: /lib/libc.so.6.1 (0x20000310000+0x3d610) [0x2000034d610]
[  1435.034] 3: /opt/xorg-ev56/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so 
(0x20000758000+0x15b890) [0x200008b3890]
[  1435.034] 4: /opt/xorg-ev56/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so 
(0x20000758000+0x1392a0) [0x200008912a0]
[  1435.034] 5: /opt/xorg-ev56/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so 
(0x20000758000+0x139bec) [0x20000891bec]
[  1435.034] 6: /opt/xorg-ev56/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so 
(0x20000758000+0x4f088) [0x200007a7088]
[  1435.035] 7: /opt/xorg-ev56/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so 
(0x20000758000+0x16f0f8) [0x200008c70f8]
[  1435.035] 8: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (AddScreen+0x1c0) [0x1200532b0]
[  1435.036] 9: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (InitOutput+0x29c) [0x12008c6ec]
[  1435.036] 10: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (0x120000000+0x24b48) [0x120024b48]
[  1435.037] 11: /lib/libc.so.6.1 (__libc_start_main+0xec) [0x2000033267c]
[  1435.037] 12: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (__start+0x38) [0x120024788]
[  1435.038] Bus error at address 0x20000030000

And nothing in dmesg.  Now I'm not triggering the nasty page alloc errors.

Cheers
Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists