[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100627212952D.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 21:32:07 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: hch@....de
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, snitzer@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
dm-devel@...hat.com, James.Bottomley@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: fix leaks associated with discard request
payload
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:07:12 +0200
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> > How about this?
>
> As I tried to explain before this utterly confuses the I/O completion
> path. With the patch applied even a simple mkfs.xfs that issues discard
> just hangs.
Wired. I just tried mkfs.xfs against scsi_debug with my block patches
(I saw one discard command). Seemed that it worked fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists