linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RFC] AIO: always reinitialize iocb->ki_run_list at the end of aio_run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:10:32 -0400
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Sergey Temerkhanov <temerkhanov@...ronik.ru>
Cc:	Sergey Temerkhanov <temerkhanov@...dex.ru>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-aio" <linux-aio@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
	Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] AIO: always reinitialize iocb->ki_run_list at the end of aio_run_iocb()

Sergey Temerkhanov <temerkhanov@...ronik.ru> writes:

> The problem with kick_iocb() is exactly as this: If retry() method 
> returns -EIOCBQUEUED to aio_run_iocb() then any subsequent call to 
> kick_iocb() results in failure. Is it expected behavior?

 * If ki_retry returns -EIOCBQUEUED it has made a promise that aio_complete()
 * will be called on the kiocb pointer in the future.  The AIO core will
 * not ask the method again -- ki_retry must ensure forward progress.

Does that answer your question?

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/