linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpumask: reduce cpumask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201006281957.34403.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:57:33 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, anton@...ba.org,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpumask: reduce cpumask_size

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:42:23 pm KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Now we're sure noone is using old cpumask operators, nor *cpumask, we can
> > allocate less bits safely.  This reduces the memory usage of off-stack
> > cpumasks when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y but we don't have NR_CPUS actual
> > cpus.
> 
> I have to say I'm sorry. Probably I broke your assumption.
> If this patch applied, we reintroduce exposing nr_cpu_ids issue and
> break libnuma again. I think following change is necessary too.
> 
> Or, Am I missing something?

I cc'd you because I remembered you being involved in that libnuma issue
and couldn't remember the details.

Unfortunately, this solution doesn't work:

> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 18faf4d..c14acad 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -4823,7 +4823,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_getaffinity, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, len,
> 
>         ret = sched_getaffinity(pid, mask);
>         if (ret == 0) {
> -               size_t retlen = min_t(size_t, len, cpumask_size());
> +               size_t retlen = min_t(size_t, len,
> +                                     BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_CPUS) * sizeof(long));
> 

Since mask is a cpumask_var_t, only cpumask_size() is allocated.  We can't
copy NR_CPUS bits.

But I think it's OK, anyway.  libnuma is broken because it gets upset if the
number of cpus it reads from /sys/.../cpumap is more than the cpumask size
returned from sys_sched_getaffinity.

Currently, getaffinity returns cpumask_size() (ie. based on NR_CPUS), and
the printing routines use nr_cpumask_bits (ie. based on NR_CPUS for 
!CPUMASK_OFFSTACK, nr_cpu_ids for CPUMASK_OFFSTACK).

(libnuma is OK on CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y because the sysfs output is
*shorter* than expected.  I checked the code).

With this patch, cpumask_size() becomes based on nr_cpumask_bits, so both
getaffinity and sysfs are using the same basis.

Do you agree?
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/