[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100628193122L.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:33:34 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: snitzer@...hat.com
Cc: hch@....de, axboe@...nel.dk, dm-devel@...hat.com,
James.Bottomley@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: defer the use of inline biovecs for discard
requests
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:56:51 -0400
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> wrote:
> Don't alloc discard bio with a biovec in blkdev_issue_discard. Doing so
> means bio_has_data() will not be true until the SCSI layer adds the
> payload to the discard request via blk_add_request_payload.
>
> bio_{enable,disable}_inline_vecs are not expected to be widely used so
> they were exported using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
>
> This patch avoids the need for the following VM accounting fix for
> discards: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/23/361
Why do we need to avoid the above fix? Surely, the above fix is hacky
but much simpler than this patch.
> NOTE: Jens, you said you applied Tao Ma's fix but I cannot see it in
> your linux-2.6-block's for-next or for-2.6.36... as such I didn't revert
> it in this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 2 ++
> block/blk-lib.c | 2 +-
> fs/bio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/bio.h | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists