[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1277725997.3561.6.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:53:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ilya Loginov <isloginov@...il.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] init: Fix race between init and kthreadd -v2
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 11:01 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> static int __init kernel_init(void * unused)
> {
> + /*
> + * Synchronize against setting kthreadd_task in rest_init().
> + * Using a mutex would have been a lot nicer, but since its a very
> + * rare race don't bother wasting the space overhead.
> + */
> + while (!kthreadd_task)
> + yield();
> +
> lock_kernel();
I just realized its all __init code so its all 'free' anyway, how about
the nicer version:
---
Subject: init: Fix race between init and kthreadd -v2
Ilya reported that on a very slow machine he could reliably reproduce a
race between forking init and kthreadd. We first fork init so that it
obtains pid-1, however since the scheduler is already fully running at
this point it can preempt and run the init thread before we spawn and
set kthreadd_task.
The init thread can then attempt spawning kthreads without kthreadd
being present which results in an OOPS.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
init/main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index e2a2bf3..8f2acf5 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -420,18 +420,27 @@ static void __init setup_command_line(char *command_line)
* gcc-3.4 accidentally inlines this function, so use noinline.
*/
+static __initdata DEFINE_MUTEX(kthreadd_lock);
+
static noinline void __init_refok rest_init(void)
__releases(kernel_lock)
{
int pid;
rcu_scheduler_starting();
+ /*
+ * We need to spawn init first so that it obtains pid-1, however
+ * the init task will end up wanting to create kthreads, which
+ * if we schedule it before we create kthreadd, will OOPS.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&kthreadd_lock);
kernel_thread(kernel_init, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_SIGHAND);
numa_default_policy();
pid = kernel_thread(kthreadd, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES);
rcu_read_lock();
kthreadd_task = find_task_by_pid_ns(pid, &init_pid_ns);
rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&kthreadd_lock);
unlock_kernel();
/*
@@ -847,6 +856,13 @@ static noinline int init_post(void)
static int __init kernel_init(void * unused)
{
+ /*
+ * We spawned this thread while holding this lock, ensure the
+ * locked section in rest_init() is complete before proceeding.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&kthreadd_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&kthreadd_lock);
+
lock_kernel();
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists