[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C2896C6.9030607@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:34:14 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
James.Bottomley@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: defer the use of inline biovecs for discard
requests
On 2010-06-26 21:56, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Don't alloc discard bio with a biovec in blkdev_issue_discard. Doing so
> means bio_has_data() will not be true until the SCSI layer adds the
> payload to the discard request via blk_add_request_payload.
Sorry, this looks horrible. What is the point of this?!
> bio_{enable,disable}_inline_vecs are not expected to be widely used so
> they were exported using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
Never export anything that doesn't have an in-kernel modular user.
> This patch avoids the need for the following VM accounting fix for
> discards: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/23/361
> NOTE: Jens, you said you applied Tao Ma's fix but I cannot see it in
> your linux-2.6-block's for-next or for-2.6.36... as such I didn't revert
> it in this patch.
It's in the for-linus branch, that is stuff headed for the current
kernel.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists