lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1277736661.3561.110.camel@laptop>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:51:01 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Ilya Loginov <isloginov@...il.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] init: Fix race between init and kthreadd -v3

On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 16:19 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> I think you may be using a mutex as a completion in essence. Why not use 
> completions instead?

Totally forgot about those things.. Yes they fit perfectly.

---
Subject: init: Fix race between init and kthreadd -v2

Ilya reported that on a very slow machine he could reliably reproduce a
race between forking init and kthreadd. We first fork init so that it 
obtains pid-1, however since the scheduler is already fully running at
this point it can preempt and run the init thread before we spawn and
set kthreadd_task.

The init thread can then attempt spawning kthreads without kthreadd
being present which results in an OOPS.

Reported-by: Ilya Loginov <isloginov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
 init/main.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index e2a2bf3..2280f63 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -420,18 +420,26 @@ static void __init setup_command_line(char *command_line)
  * gcc-3.4 accidentally inlines this function, so use noinline.
  */
 
+static __initdata DECLARE_COMPLETION(kthreadd_done);
+
 static noinline void __init_refok rest_init(void)
 	__releases(kernel_lock)
 {
 	int pid;
 
 	rcu_scheduler_starting();
+	/*
+	 * We need to spawn init first so that it obtains pid-1, however
+	 * the init task will end up wanting to create kthreads, which, if
+	 * we schedule it before we create kthreadd, will OOPS.
+	 */
 	kernel_thread(kernel_init, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_SIGHAND);
 	numa_default_policy();
 	pid = kernel_thread(kthreadd, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES);
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	kthreadd_task = find_task_by_pid_ns(pid, &init_pid_ns);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
+	complete(&kthreadd_done);
 	unlock_kernel();
 
 	/*
@@ -847,6 +855,10 @@ static noinline int init_post(void)
 
 static int __init kernel_init(void * unused)
 {
+	/*
+	 * Wait until kthreadd is all set-up.
+	 */
+	wait_for_completion(&kthreadd_done);
 	lock_kernel();
 
 	/*

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ