linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cfq: always return false from should_idle if slice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <x49hbkndmoc.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:41:55 -0400
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cfq: always return false from should_idle if slice_idle is set to zero

Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> writes:

> On 21/06/10 21.49, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> In testing a competing fsync-ing process and a sequential reader on
>> mid-grade storage, I found that cfq was incapable of achieving the I/O
>> rates of deadline, no matter how it was tuned.  Investigation, and insight
>> from Vivek (mostly the latter), led to identifying that we were still
>> idling for the last queue in the service tree.
>> 
>> Modifying cfq_should_idle to not idle when slice_idle is set to zero got
>> us much closer to the performance of deadline for this workload.  I have
>> one follow-on patch that gets us on-par with deadline, but I think this
>> patch stands alone.
>> 
>> Comments, as always, are appreciated.
>
> This looks good.

So.... applied to which branch?

Thanks!
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/