linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/alternatives] x86, alternatives: Use 16-bit numbers for cpufeature index

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C28F2A1.1030803@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:06:09 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/alternatives] x86, alternatives: Use 16-bit numbers
 for cpufeature index

On 06/28/2010 12:58 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> 
> There is alternative in use_xsave().
> use_xsave() should return false in my system, but it returns true after this patch applied.
> 

Does this patch solve your problem?

	-hpa


View attachment "0001-x86-alternatives-correct-obsolete-use-of-u8-in-stati.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1566 bytes)