[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <19AAF9AA-2445-4C73-808B-4AD9C5C7E769@dilger.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:08:41 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, smfrench@...il.com, jlayton@...hat.com,
mcao@...ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
sjayaraman@...e.de, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ext4: Make file creation time, i_version and i_generation available by xattrs
On 2010-06-28, at 10:26, David Howells wrote:
> Make the file creation time, inode data version number and inode generation
> number available on Ext4 by as xattrs named:
>
> file.crtime
> file.i_generation
> file.i_version (directories only for ext4)
Some minor nits:
- I'd prefer calling these "file.generation" and "file.version".
I don't think there is value in the "i_" prefix adds anything,
and it seems more like an internal detail to me
- why not expose the ".version" field for regular files? It seems
that all of them are applicable for all file types.
- it would be good to not introduce a new xattr namespace, since
tools like tar (even the RHEL-patched one) will not backup and
restore these namespaces. Using "trusted." would allow them to
be backed up and restored using existing xattr-patched GNU tar
by root, but wouldn't allow them to be modified by regular users.
I think this is important for proper backup/restore of a filesystem,
but can have correctness implications and shouldn't be accessible
to regular users.
> file.crtime=0x53ba244c000000000000000000000000
Is this a binary (host-endian) struct timespec?
> file.i_generation=0x0000000000000000
This seems odd, i_generation should never be zero, AFAIK.
Cheers, Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists