[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1006281517100.1977-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:19:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
mark gross <640e9920@...il.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [update] Re: [PATCH] PM: Make it possible to avoid wakeup events
from being lost
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Below is the patch I'd like to add to suspend-2.6/linux-next.
>
> Rafael
>
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> Subject: PM: Make it possible to avoid wakeup events from being lost
>
> One of the arguments during the suspend blockers discussion was that
> the mainline kernel didn't contain any mechanisms making it possible
> to avoid losing wakeup events during system suspend.
I don't see anything more to complain about in the patch. :-)
You probably should change the title and the first paragraph of the
description to avoid saying that events can get lost. Like:
PM: Make it possible to avoid races between wakeup and system sleep
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists