[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C287332.5080803@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:02:26 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted
Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> Instead of adding a new bit, can you encode the protection in the direct
> sp's access bits? So we'll have one sp for read-only or
> writeable-but-not-dirty small pages, and another sp for
> writeable-and-dirty small pages.
>
It looks like it can't solve all problems, it fix the access corrupted,
but will cause D bit losed:
mapping A and mapping B both are writable-and-dirty, when mapping A write
#PF occurs, the mapping is writable, then we can't set B's D bit anymore.
Anyway, i think we should re-intall the mapping when the state is changed. :-(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists