[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1277769867.8354.531.camel@nimitz>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:04:27 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory hotplug disable boot option
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 08:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > The directories being created are the standard directories, one for each of the memory
> > sections present at boot. I think the most used files in each of these directories
> > is the state and removable file used to do memory hotplug.
>
> And perhaps we shouldn't really be creating so many directories? Why
> not work with the memory hotplug developers to change their interface to
> not abuse sysfs in such a manner?
Heh, it wasn't abuse until we got this much memory. But, I think this
one is pretty much 100% my fault.
Nathan, I think the right fix here is probably to untie sysfs from the
sections a bit. We should be able to have sysfs dirs that represent
more than one contiguous SECTION_SIZE area of memory.
It will mean re-teaching some of the tools how things work. They'll
have to know that you can split mem sections, and we'll have to come up
with a way to do the splitting.
Does ppc *really* remove 16MB sections of RAM these days? It's probably
worth checking with the firmware folks to see what the limits are in
practice.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists