linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:45:32 +0800
From:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted



Avi Kivity wrote:

> 
> Note:
> 
> - modifying walk_addr() to call kvm_mmu_pte_write() is probably not so
> bad.  It's rare that a large pte walk sets the dirty bit, and it's
> probably rare to share those large ptes.  Still, I think the fetch()
> change is better since it's more local.
> 
> - there was once talk that instead of folding pt_access and pte_access
> together into the leaf sp->role.access, each sp level would have its own
> access permissions.  In this case we don't even have to get a new direct
> sp, only change the PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL spte to add write permissions
> (all direct sp's would be writeable and permissions would be controlled
> at their parent_pte level).  Of course that's a much bigger change than
> this bug fix.
> 

Yeah, i have considered this way, but it will change the shadow page's mapping
way: it control the access at the upper level, but in the current code, we allow
the upper level have the ALL_ACCESS and control the access right at the last level.
It will break many things, such as write-protected...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/