[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1006291500360.13809@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:01:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>
Cc: Nicolas Palix <npalix@...u.dk>, k@...e.de,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> > Indeed. I mixed things.
> >
> > But Coccinelle was already in Karmic [1].
> > Can you submit a patch with 9.10 instead of 10.04 ?
> >
> > I will Ack it.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coccinelle
>
> As you see in [1], coccinelle version in Karmic is 0.1.9.
> I don't know if it is buggy for linux.
>
> In documentation it is 0.2.0:
> > Coccinelle (>=0.2.0) is available through the package manager
> > of many distributions, e.g. :
> >
> > - Debian (>=squeeze)
> > - Fedora (>=13)
> > - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Lucid Lynx)
> > - OpenSUSE
> > - Arch Linux
> > - NetBSD
> > - FreeBSD
>
> So, if 0.1.9 is OK, I can make smth like this:
> > - Ubuntu (>=9.04 Karmic Koala, coccinelle = 0.1.9)
Do we really want all this in kernel documentation in the first place?
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists