[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201006291536.25807.npalix@diku.dk>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:36:25 +0200
From: Nicolas Palix <npalix@...u.dk>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>, k@...e.de,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 15:01:14 Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
>
> > > Indeed. I mixed things.
> > >
> > > But Coccinelle was already in Karmic [1].
> > > Can you submit a patch with 9.10 instead of 10.04 ?
> > >
> > > I will Ack it.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coccinelle
> >
> > As you see in [1], coccinelle version in Karmic is 0.1.9.
> > I don't know if it is buggy for linux.
> >
> > In documentation it is 0.2.0:
> > > Coccinelle (>=0.2.0) is available through the package manager
> > > of many distributions, e.g. :
> > >
> > > - Debian (>=squeeze)
> > > - Fedora (>=13)
> > > - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Lucid Lynx)
> > > - OpenSUSE
> > > - Arch Linux
> > > - NetBSD
> > > - FreeBSD
> >
> > So, if 0.1.9 is OK, I can make smth like this:
> > > - Ubuntu (>=9.04 Karmic Koala, coccinelle = 0.1.9)
>
> Do we really want all this in kernel documentation in the first place?
>
It addresses a comment [1] I got during the review process.
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/10/316
>
--
Nicolas Palix
Tel: (+33) 1 44 27 87 25
Tel: (+33) 6 81 07 91 72
Web: http://www.diku.dk/~npalix/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists