[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100629080757.a8028091.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:07:57 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Gao Yunpeng <yunpeng.gao@...el.com>, gregkh@...e.de
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 29 (staging/spectra)
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:19:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20100628:
>
> My fixes tree is now empty.
When CONFIG_MTD=m and
CONFIG_SPECTRA=y
# CONFIG_SPECTRA_MRST_HW is not set
CONFIG_SPECTRA_MTD=y
# CONFIG_SPECTRA_EMU is not set
build-r3554.out:(.text+0x28bc7c): undefined reference to `put_mtd_device'
build-r3554.out:(.text+0x28bcb1): undefined reference to `get_mtd_device'
due to this in spectra/Kconfig:
config SPECTRA_MTD
bool "Linux MTD mode"
depends on MTD
so when CONFIG_MTD=m, the "depends on MTD" on a 'bool' makes the bool become 'y',
which is not good.
Is this supposed to build a separate lld_mtd driver?
Can't it be tristate instead of bool?
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists