[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100629153753.GI5318@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:37:56 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: paulus <paulus@...ba.org>,
stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 11/11] perf: Rework the PMU methods
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 04:28:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Replace pmu::{enable,disable,start,stop,unthrottle} with
> pmu::{add,del,start,stop}, all of which take a flags argument.
>
> The new interface extends the capability to stop a counter while
> keeping it scheduled on the PMU. We replace the throttled state with
> the generic stopped state.
>
> This also allows us to efficiently stop/start counters over certain
> code paths (like IRQ handlers).
>
> It also allows scheduling a counter without it starting, allowing for
> a generic frozen state (useful for rotating stopped counters).
>
> The stopped state is implemented in two different ways, depending on
> how the architecture implemented the throttled state:
>
> 1) We disable the counter:
> a) the pmu has per-counter enable bits, we flip that
> b) we program a NOP event, preserving the counter state
>
> 2) We store the counter state and ignore all read/overflow events
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists