[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100629180947.GB11967@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:09:49 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: paulus <paulus@...ba.org>,
stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 11/11] perf: Rework the PMU methods
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 17:37 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>
> I know it breaks at least x86 (although subtle, takes a few perf records
> to daze and confuse), arm and sh.
>
> I need to get back to this patch-set and sort that :-)
Ok :)
But at least the whole idea looks good. Concerning the software parts
I will make a second pass to optimize from my exclusion patchset, but
other than that, it sets a nice background for it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists