[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25085.1277847455@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:37:35 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
dwalker@...eaurora.org, stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de,
florian@...kler.org, andi@...stfloor.org, mst@...hat.com,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/35] async: use workqueue for worker pool
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hmmm... workqueue workers are bound to certain cpu, so if you schedule
> a work on a specific CPU, it will run there.
That's my main problem with using cmwq to replace slow-work.
> Once a cpu gets saturated, the issuing thread will be moved elsewhere.
Assuming that the issuing thread isn't bound by the condition specified in the
previous sentence...
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists