[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100630084548.GA10325@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:15:48 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [Bugfix] unregister_trace_probe needs to be called under mutex
Comment in unregister_trace_probe() says probe_lock will be held
when it gets called. However there is a case where it might called
without the probe_lock being held. Also since we are traversing the
probe_list and deleting an element from the probe_list, probe_lock
should be held.
This was first pointed in uprobes traceevent review by Frederic
Weisbecker here. (http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/12/106)
This patch is needed for both 2.6.35-rc3 and 2.6.35-rc3-tip
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index 4f11a56..67670cd 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -269,14 +269,17 @@ static int create_trace_probe(int argc, char **argv)
pr_info("Delete command needs an event name.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
+ mutex_lock(&probe_lock);
tp = find_probe_event(event, group);
if (!tp) {
+ mutex_unlock(&probe_lock);
pr_info("Event %s/%s doesn't exist.\n", group, event);
return -ENOENT;
}
/* delete an event */
unregister_trace_probe(tp);
free_trace_probe(tp);
+ mutex_unlock(&probe_lock);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists