linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/11] oom: move OOM_DISABLE check from oom_kill_task to out_of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100630183059.AA5C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:31:36 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] oom: move OOM_DISABLE check from oom_kill_task to out_of_memory()

Now, if oom_kill_allocating_task is enabled and current have
OOM_DISABLED, following printk in oom_kill_process is called twice.

    pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %lu or sacrifice child\n",
            message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points);

So, OOM_DISABLE check should be more early.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/oom_kill.c |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index f5d903f..75f6dbc 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static void dump_header(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
 static int oom_kill_task(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	p = find_lock_task_mm(p);
-	if (!p || p->signal->oom_adj == OOM_DISABLE) {
+	if (!p) {
 		task_unlock(p);
 		return 1;
 	}
@@ -686,7 +686,8 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	if (sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task &&
-	    !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, nodemask)) {
+	    !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, nodemask) &&
+	    (current->signal->oom_adj != OOM_DISABLE)) {
 		/*
 		 * oom_kill_process() needs tasklist_lock held.  If it returns
 		 * non-zero, current could not be killed so we must fallback to
-- 
1.6.5.2



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/