[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100630004911.GI4837@outflux.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:49:12 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] security: Yama LSM
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:18:32AM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > This adds the Yama Linux Security Module to collect several security
> > features (symlink, hardlink, and PTRACE restrictions) that have existed
> > in various forms over the years and have been carried outside the mainline
> > kernel by other Linux distributions like Openwall and grsecurity.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
>
> There were no further complaints, and we seem to have reached a workable
> consensus on the topic.
>
> It's not clear yet whether existing LSMs will modify their base policies
> to incorporate these protections, utilize the Yama code more directly, or
> implement some combination of both.
I'm hoping we can implement really simple chaining -- nothing fancy.
Trying to chain comprehensive LSMs seems like it will always fail, but
putting little LSMs in front of big LSMs seems like an easy win.
> If you're a user of an existing LSM and want these protections, bug the
> developers for a solution :-)
>
> Applied to
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next
Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists