[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100630104155.GA1370@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:41:55 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: fix leaks associated with discard request payload
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 01:25:01PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> OK, Thanks, I see. Is it one of these operations, (like we have in OSD) where
> the CDB information spills into the payload? like the scatter-gather and extent
> lists and such.
For UNMAP the payload is a list of block number / length pairs, while
the CDB itself doesn't contain any information like that. It's a rather
awkward command.
> Do we actually use a WRITE_SAME which is not zero? for what use?
The kernel doesn't issue any WRITE SAME without the unmap bit set.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists