[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100630124742.GD10072@secunet.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:47:42 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Dan Kruchinin <kruchinin@...ell.ru>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pcrypt: sysfs interface
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:39:39PM +0400, Dan Kruchinin wrote:
[snip]
> @@ -390,6 +427,9 @@ static int __init pcrypt_init(void)
> if (!pcrypt_dec_padata)
> goto err_free_padata;
>
> + if (pcrypt_init_sysfs() != 0)
> + goto err_free_padata;
We leak pcrypt_dec_padata if pcrypt_init_sysfs() fails.
pcrypt_dec_padata must be freed in this case.
[snip]
> struct padata_priv {
> - struct list_head list;
> - struct parallel_data *pd;
> - int cb_cpu;
> - int seq_nr;
> - int info;
> - void (*parallel)(struct padata_priv *padata);
> - void (*serial)(struct padata_priv *padata);
> + struct list_head list;
> + struct parallel_data *pd;
> + int cb_cpu;
> + int seq_nr;
> + int info;
> + void (*parallel)(struct padata_priv *padata);
> + void (*serial)(struct padata_priv *padata);
> };
These whitespace changes are quite pointless.
Please try to avoid such whitespace changes in patches that
change real content.
[snip]
> @@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ static void padata_parallel_worker(struct work_struct *parallel_work)
> struct padata_priv, list);
>
> list_del_init(&padata->list);
> + atomic_dec(&pinst->stat.parallel_objs);
>
> padata->parallel(padata);
> }
> @@ -166,6 +168,7 @@ int padata_do_parallel(struct padata_instance *pinst,
> pqueue = per_cpu_ptr(pd->pqueue, target_cpu);
>
> spin_lock(&pqueue->parallel.lock);
> + atomic_inc(&pinst->stat.parallel_objs);
> list_add_tail(&padata->list, &pqueue->parallel.list);
> spin_unlock(&pqueue->parallel.lock);
These statistic counters add a lot of atomic operations to the fast-path.
Would'nt it be better to have these statistics in a percpu manner?
This would avoid the atomic operations and we would get some additional
information on the distribution of the queued objects.
>
> @@ -202,6 +205,7 @@ static struct padata_priv *padata_get_next(struct parallel_data *pd)
> struct padata_parallel_queue *queue, *next_queue;
> struct padata_priv *padata;
> struct padata_list *reorder;
> + struct padata_stat *stat = &pd->pinst->stat;
>
> empty = 0;
> next_nr = -1;
> @@ -266,7 +270,7 @@ static struct padata_priv *padata_get_next(struct parallel_data *pd)
>
> spin_lock(&reorder->lock);
> list_del_init(&padata->list);
> - atomic_dec(&pd->reorder_objects);
> + atomic_dec(&stat->reorder_objs);
> spin_unlock(&reorder->lock);
>
> atomic_inc(&next_queue->num_obj);
> @@ -330,6 +334,7 @@ static void padata_reorder(struct parallel_data *pd)
> squeue = per_cpu_ptr(pd->squeue, padata->cb_cpu);
>
> spin_lock(&squeue->serial.lock);
> + atomic_inc(&pinst->stat.serial_objs);
Wrong code indent.
Please try to split the patch in a padata and a pcrypt part.
I.e. add the interface to padata, then use it with pcrypt.
Thanks again,
Steffen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists