[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C2A9A1E.6010005@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:13:02 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com,
Ky Srinivasan <KSrinivasan@...ell.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4, v2] x86: enlightenment for ticket spin locks - eliminate
NOPs introduced by first patch
On 06/29/2010 07:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Under the assumption that the nop-s added by the base ticket spinlock
> enlightenment patch might be considered undesirable (or worse), here
> is an optional patch to eliminate these nop-s again. This is done
> through extending the memory operands of the inc instructions used for
> unlocking ticket locks to the necessary size, using assembler and
> linker features.
>
> --- 2.6.35-rc3-virt-spinlocks.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ 2.6.35-rc3-virt-spinlocks/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ENLIGHTEN_SPINLOCKS
> #include <asm/alternative.h>
> -#include <asm/nops.h>
> /* Including asm/smp.h here causes a cyclic include dependency. */
> #include <asm/percpu.h>
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_number);
> @@ -156,8 +155,7 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_spi
> #else
> unsigned int token;
>
> - alternative_io(UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX "incb %[lock]\n\t"
> - ASM_NOP3,
> + alternative_io(UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX "unary incb %[lock]\n\t",
> ALTERNATIVE_TICKET_UNLOCK_HEAD
> UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX "incb %[lock]\n\t"
> "movzwl %[lock], %[token]\n\t"
> @@ -228,8 +226,7 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_spi
> #else
> unsigned int token, tmp;
>
> - alternative_io(UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX "incw %[lock]\n\t"
> - ASM_NOP2,
> + alternative_io(UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX "unary incw %[lock]\n\t",
> ALTERNATIVE_TICKET_UNLOCK_HEAD
> UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX "incw %[lock]\n\t"
> "movl %[lock], %[token]\n\t"
If you're stretching (bloating) them anyway, perhaps we should be using
"add" instructions instead, with their better EFLAGS behavior?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists