[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100630013053.GK4150@mail.oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:30:53 -0700
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Revert "writeback: limit
write_cache_pages integrity scanning to current EOF"
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 01:16:11AM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:20:33PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Your call, I guess. If any ocfs2 fix looks scary, and you'd prefer to
> > have an -rc4 (in a few days - not today) with just the revert, I'm ok
> > with that. Even if it's only a "at least no worse than 2.6.34"
> > situation rather than a real fix.
>
> If -rc4 isn't coming for a couple of days, can we hold off on
> the decision until we get a chance to think about a paper-over solution
> for it? Then we can avoid the revert.
Linus,
I'm going to withdraw the revert request for now. Our proposed
paper-over solution is too big, and we're just going to focus on the
actual fix. This will be for .35. Yes, .35-rc will have a BUG_ON with
refcount trees until we get the fix in, but I'd rather avoid the churn
when the final .35 should have Dave's patch and our fix.
Joel
--
"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."
-Henry VI, IV:ii
Joel Becker
Consulting Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@...cle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists