lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C2B9D43.4070504@colorfullife.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:38:43 +0200
From:	Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [S+Q 01/16] [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Bugfix for semop() not reporting
 successful operation

Hi Andrew,

On 06/29/2010 09:08 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:42:42 -0500 (CDT)
> Christoph Lameter<cl@...ux-foundation.org>  wrote:
>
>    
>> This is a patch from Manfred. Required to make 2.6.35-rc3 work.
>>
>>      
> My current version of the patch is below.
>
> I believe that Luca has still seen problems with this patch applied so
> its current status is "stuck, awaiting developments".
>
> Is that a correct determination?
>    

I would propose that you forward a patch to Linus - either the one you 
have in your tree or the v2 that I've just posted.
With stock 2.6.35-rc3, my semtimedop() stress tests produces an oops or 
an invalid return value (i.e.:semtimedop() returns with "1") within a 
fraction of a second.

With either of the patches applied, my test apps show the expected behavior.

--
     Manfred


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ