lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1277928125.18854.0.camel@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:02:05 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
To:	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:	Chris Li <lkml@...isli.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG in drivers/dma/ioat/dma_v2.c:314

On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 20:40 +0100, Williams, Dan J wrote:
>  From the dmesg:
> > IOMMU 0: reg_base_addr fe710000 ver 1:0 cap 900000c2f0462 ecap e01
> > DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fe714000 flags: 0x0
> > IOMMU 1: reg_base_addr fe714000 ver 1:0 cap 900000c2f0462 ecap e01
> > DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fe719000 flags: 0x0
> > IOMMU 2: reg_base_addr fe719000 ver 1:0 cap 900000c2f0462 ecap e01
> > DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fe718000 flags: 0x1
> > IOMMU 3: reg_base_addr fe718000 ver 1:0 cap 900000c2f0462 ecap e01
> 
> Where we expect bit 54 to be set for the DMA iommu, and it does not 
> appear to show up.

So the BIOS is lying to us about which PCI devices are attached to which
IOMMU?

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ