[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201006302352.34594.npalix@diku.dk>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:52:33 +0200
From: Nicolas Palix <npalix@...u.dk>
To: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
cocci@...u.dk, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
Kernel Janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
walter harms <wharms@....de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Add a target to use the Coccinelle checker
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 20:58:54 Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 17:15 +0200, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> > + echo ' The semantic patch that makes this change is available'
> > + echo " in $FILE."
> > + echo ''
> > + echo ' More information about semantic patching is available at'
> > + echo ' http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/'
> > + echo ''
> > +
> > + $SPATCH -D $MODE -very_quiet -sp_file $COCCI $OPT -dir $DIR
>
> Here I've got output:
>
> /usr/lib/coccinelle/spatch: unknown option `-very_quiet'.
> Usage: spatch -sp_file <SP> <infile> [-o <outfile>] [-iso_file <iso>] [options]
> Options are:
> [...]
>
>
> I use ubuntu Lucid 10.04 as said in Documentation/coccinelle.txt.
>
> $ LANG=C apt-cache policy coccinelle
> [...]
> Installed: 0.2.0.deb-1ubuntu2
> [...]
>
>
> If I delete -very_quiet then It runs OK, but output is not ommited:
Indeed, I just checked that. This option has been added in 0.2.1
which was not ported from Debian before the feature freeze of Ubuntu Lucid :(
>
> init_defs_builtins: /usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h
> HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/min_addr.c
> HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/proc.c
> HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/keyring.c
> HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/gc.c
> HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/process_keys.c
> HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/request_key_auth.c
> [...]
>
>
> > +if [ "$COCCI" = "" ] ; then
> > + for f in `find $srctree/scripts/coccinelle/ -name '*.cocci' -type f | sort`; do
> > + coccinelle $f $srctree;
> > + done
> > +else
> > + coccinelle $COCCI $srctree
> > +fi
>
> I think it is more usefull to use $M instead of $srctree to run simple
> 'make coccicheck'.
What is the purpose of $M ?
I submitted an incremental patch to add support for $C.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Nicolas Palix
Tel: (+33) 1 44 27 87 25
Tel: (+33) 6 81 07 91 72
Web: http://www.diku.dk/~npalix/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists