[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100630150947.d53200ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:09:47 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>,
Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@...com>,
linux-mmc Mailing List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] block: Add secure discard
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:44:23 +0300
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com> wrote:
> >From b25b9a499f255ee5999c219525d82ef40382318c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:41:38 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] block: Add secure discard
>
> Secure discard is the same as discard except that all copies
> of the discarded sectors (perhaps created by garbage collection)
> must also be erased.
That's not an awfully informative changelog.
>From a quick peek at the code it seems that you took your earlier
design sketch:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:10:06PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Needs a bio flag, a request flag, setup the request flag based on the
> bio flag, prevent merging secure and non-secure discards, prevent drivers
> doing non-secure discards for secure discards.
>
> Seems like a lot of little changes for something that no one wants.
> Shouldn't it wait for someone to need it first?
and changed your mind and implemented it.
Is that a correct interpretation?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists