linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4, v2] x86: enlightenment for ticket spin locks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C2BC1AB.9050500@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:14:03 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ky Srinivasan <KSrinivasan@...ell.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4, v2] x86: enlightenment for ticket spin locks -	 Xen
  implementation

On 06/30/2010 06:23 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> pvops is a superset of alternative instruction patching, and are really
> designed to serve different purposes.  There are some areas in which
> there's some overlap, but otherwise they are distinct.  In particular,
> alternative instructions are really only useful if you can express the
> patch in terms of the presence or absence of a particular cpu feature. 
> It can't do multi-way choice, and it can't do anything other than insert
> literal instructions.  pvops patching can do multi-way, and has a
> higher-level view of each patch site which allows it to do things like
> generate appropraite save/restores, make inline vs call decisions, nop
> out nop callsites, etc.
> 

A lot of this -- in particular the multiway -- is a defect in the
alternatives implementation and should have been addressed as such.  One
of the biggest problems with pvops as it currently stands is that it is
monolithic; in general we have this class of problems (static selection)
in a *lot* more places than we're dealing with right now, and as such,
generalizing *something* -- be it pvops or alternatives -- would be useful.

gcc 4.5 also includes a very powerful facility called "asm goto", which
I have already used to implement static_cpu_has().  Again, that
particular construct (unlike "asm goto" itself) doesn't support multiway.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/