[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100630225754.GT19184@bicker>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 00:57:54 +0200
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Peter Pan <wppan@...flag-linux.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, hch@....de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, npiggin@...e.de,
jblunck@...e.de, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2:delete misused ext2_free_blocks
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 06:21:27PM +0800, Peter Pan wrote:
> if ext2_new_blocks returns error, no blocks need to be freed.
>
Hi Peter,
Your patch isn't right. The original code is OK as is.
Are you seeing a kernel panic? Perhaps we can help you fix it.
regards,
dan carpenter
> Signed-off-by: Peter Pan <wppan@...flag-linux.com>
> ---
> fs/ext2/inode.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> index 3675088..f858847 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> @@ -385,6 +385,8 @@ static int ext2_alloc_blocks(struct inode *inode,
> ext2_fsblk_t current_block = 0;
> int ret = 0;
>
> + *err = -ENOSPC;
> +
> /*
> * Here we try to allocate the requested multiple blocks at once,
> * on a best-effort basis.
> @@ -421,8 +423,6 @@ static int ext2_alloc_blocks(struct inode *inode,
> *err = 0;
> return ret;
> failed_out:
> - for (i = 0; i <index; i++)
> - ext2_free_blocks(inode, new_blocks[i], 1);
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 1.6.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists