linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4, v2] x86: enlightenment for ticket spin locks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007011105430.30135@kaball-desktop>
Date:	Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:39:25 +0100
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
CC:	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	ksrinivasan <ksrinivasan@...ell.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4, v2] x86: enlightenment for ticket spin locks -  Xen
  implementation

On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 30.06.10 at 17:57, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >> On 06/29/2010 04:32 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> > Use the (alternative instructions based) callout hooks to the ticket
> >> > spinlock code to enlighten ticket locks when running fully virtualized
> >> > on Xen. Ultimately, this code might also be a candidate to be used
> >> > when running para-virtualized.
> >> >
> >> 
> >> I'm not sure what the gain is by making this independent of all the rest
> >> of the Xen support in the kernel.  Stefano is working on a series
> >> (posted a few times now) to add more paravirtual features for Xen HVM
> >> guests, and this work is conceptually very similar.
> > 
> > My series has been stable since a while now and contains all the basic
> > PV on HVM mechanisms you need, including parsing the cpuid and mapping
> > the shared info page.
> > 
> > Could you please rebase on my series (or at least the first two
> > patches), so that we don't conflict with each other?
> 
> I really don't want to make those patches depend on no upstream
> stuff (as I want it accepted upstream), and I'm not sure when your
> patch series is expected to be upstream. If that's going to be soon,
> I'd just re-base after it happened.
 
Given that the patch series has been tested and reviewed several times
by now, I don't expect big changes any more.
Therefore I hope it will be accepted as soon as possible (keeping in
mind that we are in RC3 right now).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/