[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C2BEB48.3080705@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:11:36 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/11] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest
#PF
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> +
>> + addr = gfn_to_hva_many(vcpu->kvm, gfn, &entry);
>> + if (kvm_is_error_hva(addr))
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> + entry = min(entry, (int)(end - start));
>> + ret = __get_user_pages_fast(addr, entry, 1, pages);
>> + if (ret <= 0)
>> + return -1;
>
> Why can't you use gfn_to_pfn_atomic() here, one page at a time? Is
> the overhead significant that this is worthwhile?
>
> You're bypassing the centralized interface.
I think it's worthwhile to do since we can reduce gup overhead, no reason
to traverse process's page table again and again for the consecutive pages.
>
>> +
>> + pte_access = sp->role.access & FNAME(gpte_access)(vcpu, gpte);
>> + mmu_set_spte(vcpu, spte, sp->role.access, pte_access, 0, 0,
>> + is_dirty_gpte(gpte), NULL, sp->role.level, gfn,
>> + pfn, true, false);
>
> reset_host_protection should be true, see commit 1403283acca (also for
> direct case to be consistent).
>
Ah, i forgot it, thanks, Marcelo!
I'll post a small fix patch base on this patchset to change 'false' to 'true' if no
other places no to be improved. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists