[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100701155330.GD10616@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:53:33 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] perf: Generalize some arch callchain code
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 05:51:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 17:49 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 05:46:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 17:35 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > - Most archs use one callchain buffer per cpu, except x86 that needs
> > > > to deal with NMIs. Provide a default perf_callchain_buffer()
> > > > implementation that x86 overrides.
> > >
> > > sparc and power also have NMI like contexts.
> >
> >
> > Ah and the comments suggest it's because pmu interrupts can't nest or so.
> > Anyway, that's notwithstanding the race that 5th patch fixes.
>
> Right, but they could interrupt a software event or the like.
Yeah indeed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists